Krauthammer: Cheney Is Winning the Debate Debunking Liberal Argument that Enhance ‘Torture’ Doesn’t Work

#ad▼

Liberal Position: Enhanced Interrogation ‘Torture Doesn’t Work’ … Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer outlines the points that support former Vice President Dick Cheney’s debate that debunks the liberal position. Here they are:

1. People intuitively know that everybody has a breaking point when experiencing torture.

2. OIG Report (Office of Inspector General) that tells you in black and white that Kalik Shiek Muhamad* said nothing of interest until he was exposed to simulated drowning and sleep deprivation … then he became a professor of Al Qaeda with a chalkboard.

3. And finally, liberals say its a coincidence that he didn’t say anything before [the ‘torture’] and spoke after. And its a coincidence that there were no attacks in eights years. Krauthammer explains that reason debunks the liberal stance.

Krauthammer concludes that Cheney is winning the debate because it is obvious, intuitively and empirically, that the interrogation techniques have saved American lives.

Khaled-Saad-Muhammad
Kahlid Saad Mohammed (KSM) is a citizen of Saudi Arabia held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps, in Cuba

Search Amazon …

Search for products sold on Amazon:

Arlingtoncardinal.com is an Amazon Associate website, which means that a small percentage of your purchases gets paid to Arlingtoncardinal.com at no extra cost to you. When you use the search boxes above, any Amazon banner ad, or any product associated with an Amazon banner on this website, you help pay expenses related to maintaining Arlingtoncardinal.com and creating new services and ideas for a resourceful website. See more info at Arlingtoncardinal.com/AdDisclosure